Urban informality and data intelligence to optimize public management in intermediary cities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26871/killkana_social.v10i3.1831

Keywords:

local administration, socioeconomic indicators, labor market, urban planning, informal sector

Abstract

Urban informality overflows the instruments of control of Andean intermediate cities. The municipal response is usually reactive because it lacks a territorial diagnosis that anticipates the pressure on public space. This work shows that data intelligence allows this diagnosis to be built with open official statistics and reproducible procedures. The study applies to Tungurahua and its capital, Ambato, in Ecuador. The design is quantitative, cross-sectional, and spatially explicit. It uses the provincial panel of the National Survey of Employment, Unemployment and Underemployment of 2024 and 2025 for the twenty-four provinces. The procedure combines descriptive statistics, Moran's global index, local indicators of spatial association, Spearman's correlations and a typology based on the level of informality and its interannual trajectory. The results show a territorial distribution without a continuous regional gradient. Moran's index was weak and not significant with five close neighbors (0.086; p = 0.095) and contiguity (0.093; p = 0.131). Tungurahua registers 52.0%, compared to the average of 71.2% of its neighbors, so it forms a low cluster surrounded by high values. However, it rises from 50.5%, while the country drops from 52.4% to 51.5%. Informality replaces adequate employment (−0.873) and cushions open unemployment (−0.581). The study proposes a replicable protocol that offers indicators, alert thresholds and decisions to efficiently optimize the management of public space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguinaga, R. J. B., & Saltos, M. P. I. (2022). El comercio informal en los espacios públicos de la ciudad de Ambato. Killkana Social, 6(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.26871/KILLKANASOCIAL.V6I2.930

Aguinaga, R. J., & Pérez, O. B. (2022). Problemas de convivencia ciudadana a partir del comercio informal en espacios públicos. Revista Uniandes Episteme, 9(3), 410–426. https://revista.uniandes.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/EPISTEME/article/view/2393

Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA). Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1538-4632.1995.TB00338.X

Batty, M. (2013). The New Science of Cities. The New Science of Cities. https://doi.org/10.7551/MITPRESS/9399.001.0001

Bromley, R. D. F., & Mackie, P. K. (2009). Displacement and the new spaces for informal trade in the Latin American City centre. Urban Studies, 46(7), 1485–1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009104577

Castro, V. M., & Chías, P. N. (2019). Comercio informal y el espacio urbano en el centro de Ambato. Eidos, (14), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.29019/EIDOS.V14I1.605

Chen, M. A. (2012). La economía informal: definiciones, teorías y políticas. WIEGO. www.wiego.org

De Soto, H. (1989). The other path: the invisible revolution in the Third World. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World, 335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2620450

Hart, K. (1973). Informal Income Opportunities and Urban Employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00008089

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2023). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2022: Resultados de la provincia de Tungurahua. INEC.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2026). Encuesta Nacional de Empleo, Desempleo y Subempleo. Principales resultados del mercado laboral, anual 2025 (Boletín Técnico N.º 03-2026-ENEMDU). INEC.

Kitchin, R. (2013). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 2013 79:1, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10708-013-9516-8

Moran, P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomenia. Biometrika, 37(1–2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOMET/37.1-2.17

Portes, Alejandro., & Haller, William. (2005). La economía informal. Naciones Unidas, CEPAL, División de Desarrollo Social.

Quispe, M. F., Nina, D. A., Villa, M. V., & Flores, R. V. (2020). Comercio informal en ciudades intermedias del Ecuador: Efectos socioeconómicos y tributarios/ Informal trade in intermediate cities of Ecuador: Socioeconomic and tax effects. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 26(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.31876/RCS.V26I3.33243

Roever, S., & Skinner, C. (2016). Street vendors and cities. Environment and Urbanization, 28(2), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816653898

Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Bonilla Jurado, D. M., Meléndez Gavilanes, C. A., & Jara Vásquez, E. A. (2026). Urban informality and data intelligence to optimize public management in intermediary cities. Killkana Social, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.26871/killkana_social.v10i3.1831

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.