Peer Review
1. Type of Review
Killkana Sociales Journal applies a double-blind peer review system, ensuring the anonymity of both authors and reviewers throughout the entire editorial process.
2. Purpose of the Peer Review Process
The peer review process aims to ensure:
- Scientific quality of manuscripts
- Methodological rigor
- Thematic relevance
- Originality and contribution to knowledge
3. Editorial Process Stages
All submitted manuscripts undergo the following stages:
3.1. Initial Editorial Screening
The Editorial Committee conducts a preliminary review to verify:
- Compliance with editorial guidelines
- Alignment with the journal’s scope and subject areas
- Originality and overall quality of the manuscript
At this stage, the journal may use artificial intelligence (AI) tools as technical support to analyze thematic alignment and relevance, in order to optimize the initial screening process prior to assigning peer reviewers.
Estimated time: up to 10 business days.
3.2. External Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two external reviewers, who are experts in the relevant field.
The evaluation is conducted under a double-blind review process.
Estimated time: 2 to 4 weeks.
4. Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on:
- Originality of the research
- Methodological rigor
- Clarity and coherence of the content
- Scientific and academic relevance
- Contribution to the field
5. Possible Decisions
Reviewers may issue the following recommendations:
- Accept
- Accept with minor revisions
- Accept with major revisions
- Reject
6. Revision Process
Authors are required to:
- Respond to reviewers’ comments
- Submit a revised version of the manuscript
- Justify any suggested changes not incorporated
If necessary, the manuscript may undergo an additional round of review.
7. Final Editorial Decision
The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editorial Committee and is formally communicated to the authors.
In case of rejection, the corresponding justifications will be provided.
8. Timeline
The estimated duration of the complete editorial process is: 8 to 12 weeks
9. Ethical Principles of Peer Review
The peer review process is governed by the principles of:
- Confidentiality
- Objectivity
- Transparency
- Impartiality
Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest and refrain from participating if such conflicts exist.
10. Reviewers’ Responsibilities
Reviewers are expected to:
- Conduct objective, critical, and well-founded evaluations
- Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript
- Avoid conflicts of interest
- Provide constructive and clear feedback
11. Authors’ Responsibilities
Authors must:
- Ensure the originality of the manuscript
- Respond adequately to reviewers’ comments
- Comply with ethical publication standards
12. Transparency and Editorial Quality
Killkana Sociales Journal ensures that the peer review process is independent, transparent, and focused on continuous improvement of scientific quality.
