Microfiltración de resinas Bulk Fill vs resinas convencionales: revisión sistemática

Jaime  Terán-Calle; Priscilla Medina Sotomayor; José David Aguilar Maldonado; Paola Ordoñez Crespo; Gabriela Alejandra Ortega Castro; Alexandra  Gil-Pozo

doi:10.26871/killcanasalud.v6i3.981

Authors

Jaime Terán-Calle Universidad Católica de Cuenca
Priscilla Medina Sotomayor Carrera de Odontología, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Sede Azogues
José David Aguilar Maldonado Universidad Católica de Cuenca
Paola Ordoñez Crespo Universidad Católica de Cuenca
Gabriela Alejandra Ortega Castro Universidad Católica de Cuenca
Alexandra Gil-Pozo Universidad de Cuenca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26871/killcanasalud.v6i3.981

Keywords:

adaptación, marginal, materiales dentales , composite , técnica

Abstract

Objective: evaluate the degree of microfiltration of bulk fill composite compared to conventional composite.Methodology. The present systematic review was carried out according to the guidelines of the PRISMA Declaration. The PICO question was established as: What is the degree of microfiltration of bulk fill resins compared to conventional resins? The Web of science database was used to search for information, using as keywords: Bulk Fill and Dental marginal Adaptation And Incremental Techniques And Marginal Adaptation And Conventional composite And interface. As inclusion criteria, articles from 2015 to 2021 in English and Spanish were considered. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, in vitro studies, systematic reviews were included. A total of 10 articles were obtained for quality analysis Results: after quality analysis, all the articles qualified as "low bias". Within the methods of analysis of microleakage heterogeneity was found in its determination. The Ryge USPHS method determined restoration survival clinically while those analyzing interface gap, marginal mismatch and cohesion failure of the restoration margin used scanning electron microscopy. Conclusions. Bulk fill resins have a lower degree of microleakage compared to conventional resins. However, the use of bulk fill resins as a cavity base in a flowable form minimizes microleakage in the long term.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Correia AM de O, Pereira VEM, Bresciani E, Platt JA, Borges ALS, Caneppele TMF. Influence of cavosurface angle on the stress concentration and gaps formation in class V resin composite restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. [Internet] 2019 Sep 1;97:272–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.034

Correia AM de O, Tribst JPM, Matos F de S, Platt JA, Caneppele TMF, Borges ALS. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. [Internet] 2018; 76:68–74. 10.1016 / j. jdent.2018.06.010

Pişkin MB, Atali PY, KantürkFigen A. Thermal, spectral, and surface properties of LED light-polymerized bulk fill resin composites. Biomed Tech. [Internet] 2015;60(1):65–75. 10.1515 / bmt-2014-0052.

Marjanovic J, Veljovic DN, Stasic JN, Savic-Stankovic T, Trifkovic B, Miletic V. Optical properties of composite restorations influenced by dissimilar dentin restoratives. Dent Mater. [Internet] 2018;34(5):737–45. 10.1016 / j. dental.2018.01.017

Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. VERIFIABLE CPD PAPER Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials : a review. Nat Publ Gr. [Internet] 2017;222(5):337–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214

Alshaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin-based composites: A literature review. Saudi Dent J. [Internet] 2017;29(2):48–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.01.002

Varshan R, Sandhya R, Selvarasu K. Factors affecting polymerization of resin. [Internet] 2019;12(3):2018–20. https://jprsolutions.info/files/final-file-5c9c7b8164d613.

Veerandar T, Patil JP, Raju RVSC. Comparison of Effect of C-Factor on Bond Strength to Human Dentin Using Different Composite Resin Materials. [Internet] 2015;88–91. 10.7860 / JCDR / 2015 / 140266384.

Rodriguez AM del V, Alvarez NM del R, Christiani JJ. Marginal leakage and polymerization shrinkage in new Bulk Fill resins: a review of the literature. Rev Ateneo Argent Odontol. [Internet] 2021;77-82. Available from: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2021/06/1252984/articulo12.pdf

Cascaes da Silva Franciele, Valdivia Arancibia Beatriz Angélica, da Rosa Iop Rodrigo, Barbosa Gutierres Filho Paulo Jose, da Silva Rudney. Escalas y listas de evaluación de la calidad de estudios científicos. Rev. cuba. inf. cienc. salud [Internet]. 2013 Sep [citado 2022 Mar 14] ; 24( 3 ): 295-312. https://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2307-21132013000300007&lng=es.

Yazici AR, Antonson SA, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E. Thirty-six-month clinical comparison of bulk fill and nanofill composite restorations. Oper Dent. [Internet] 2017;42(5):478–85. 10.2341 / 16-220-C

Balkaya H, Arslan S. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities. Oper Dent. [Internet] 2020;45(1): E32–42. 10.2341 / 19-078-C

Fronza BM, Makishi P, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J, et al. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation. Braz Oral Res. [Internet] 2018;32(0): e80. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0080

Alqudaihi FS, Cook NB, Diefenderfer KE, Bottino MC, Platt JA. Comparison of internal adaptation of bulk-fill and increment-fill resin composite materials. Oper Dent. [Internet] 2019;44(1): E32–44. 10.2341 / 17-269-L

Jung JH, Park SH. Comparison of polymerization shrinkage, physical properties, and marginal adaptation of flowable and restorative bulk fill resin-based composites. Oper Dent. [Internet] 2017;42(4):375–86. 10.2341 / 16-254-L

Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, Mogilevych B, Soares LES, Martin AA, et al. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater. [Internet] 2015;31(12):1542–51. 10.1016 / j.dental.2015.10.001.

Gerula-Szymańska A, Kaczor K, Lewusz-Butkiewicz K, Nowicka A. Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class ii restorations —A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater J. [Internet] 2020;39(3):335–44. 10.4012 / dmj.2018-180.

Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of massive and conventional composite resin restorations in posterior teeth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. [Internet] 2019; 23 (1): 221-33. 10.1007 / s00784-018-2429-7

Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, Lie Nakano E, Ayala Perez MD, Pfeifer CS, et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin -a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. [Internet] 2019;35(10):e249–64. 10.1016 / j.dental.2019.07.007

Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gómez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: A systematic review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. [Internet] 2018.30:492–501. 10.1111 / jerd.12394

Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Urrútia G, Romero-García M, Alonso-Fernández S. Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Rev Esp Cardiol. [Internet] 2021;74(9):790–9. https://www.revespcardiol.org/es-declaracion-prisma-2020-una-guia-articulo-S0300893221002748

Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Çolak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent [Internet]. 2017;8(2). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26800647/

Al-Harbi F, Kaisarly D, Bader D, El Gezawi M. Marginal integrity of bulk versus incremental fill class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. [Internet] 2016;41(2):146–56. 10.2341 / 14-306-L.

Han S-H, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Park S-H. Internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without an intermediate layer: Effect of polymerization shrinkage parameters of the layer material. J Dent. [Internet] 2019; 80:41–8. 10.1016 / j. jdent.2018.10.013.

Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honoré D, Pedersen MK, Pallesen U. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent. [Internet] 2015;40(2):190–200. 10.2341 / 13-324-L.

Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of “bulk-filled” posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. Dent Mater. [Internet] 2015;30(9): e245-51. 10.1016 / j. dental.2014.05.028.

Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation. Eur J Oral Sci. [Internet] 2017;125(4):303–9. 10.1111 / eos.12351

Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent. [Internet] 2016; 51:29–35. 10.1016 / j. jdent.2016.05.008

Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. [Internet] 2014;8(1):1–8. 10.4103 / 1305-7456.126230